Preview build People, jobs, listings and posts are samples. Guides, events and the directory are real.
ArboNation Join free

Neighbour tree law in Victoria: common law and the law reform report

The Victorian Government's tree page says tree disputes between neighbours are covered by general property law and common law, not by a tree Act. This page restates that page, Victoria Legal Aid's page and the Victorian Law Reform Commission's report that proposed a new Act.

Checked against the sources at the bottom of this page on October 8, 2026. Rules, fees and pay change: the source has the last word.

This page reports what the official source says. It is not legal advice: ask the office named here. It describes the Victorian position as read on October 8, 2026 on the Victorian Government site, Victoria Legal Aid and the Victorian Law Reform Commission site. Victoria Legal Aid's own page says its material is a general guide only.

No tree Act, so the common law applies

The vic.gov.au page "Trees in Victoria", from the Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria, says that in Victoria trees are covered by general property law and common law, "which is law the courts have developed over time". It says a tree owner generally has no legal obligation to maintain a tree unless it is causing damage or nuisance, and that trees can also be covered by council rules. It says the council will not help resolve a dispute or cut back a tree for a neighbour unless the tree is on council land.

The Victorian Law Reform Commission report on neighbourhood tree disputes confirms the same point in its chapter on current law: the resolution of tree disputes is based on the law of torts, largely developed through judge-made case law, and "there is no legislation specific to the process for resolving private tree disputes between neighbours in Victoria". The report names the torts a neighbour will usually rely on as nuisance, negligence and trespass. It describes nuisance as an act or omission that causes substantial and unreasonable interference with a neighbour's land or enjoyment of land, and says mere encroachment of overhanging branches is unlikely to be a nuisance unless special damage is proven.

Cutting back what crosses the boundary

The vic.gov.au page says a neighbour has the right to cut back branches, leaves or roots that cross the boundary line at their own cost, known as the right of abatement. It says that before doing so the council should be asked whether the tree is protected, because a permit may be needed. It lists consent as needed before entering the neighbour's land to perform maintenance, and says the person cutting is liable for any damage caused to the neighbour's tree. For a rented home, it says acting without the rental provider's permission could breach the rental agreement. In its list of common questions it says a person cutting back must, unless otherwise agreed, return the branches and leaves to the neighbour.

Victoria Legal Aid's page "Fences and trees" says property owners are responsible for branches that overhang a neighbour's fence and for roots that grow onto neighbouring property, and that if these cause damage or affect the neighbour's enjoyment of their property the neighbour can take the owner to court. It says that if branches hang over the neighbour's side of the fence, the neighbour can cut off the overhanging branches and place them on the owner's side.

Light, views and cost

The vic.gov.au page says there are no rules or regulations in Victoria that force a property owner not to plant big trees. For a tree that blocks light or views it suggests mediation, and says the court is another option. It says tree owners are not obliged to pay for tree maintenance, and that a neighbour who wants the owner to pay must show the tree is damaging the property or is found at court to be a private nuisance. Damage from branches, foliage and roots may make the owner liable, and the page refers to the Fences Act for damage to a boundary fence.

The court and the nuisance test

The page says the local Magistrates' Court can decide whether the tree issue is a private nuisance and who contributes what to costs. It lists what the court considers: the neighbourhood's general environment, where the interference happens, what is causing it, how long it has been happening, the impact, whether it was there when the neighbour moved in, how useful the activity is and what reasonable people would think. It adds that trees drop leaves, bark, sticks, flowers, fruit and sap as part of their normal life cycle, which is not usually considered a private nuisance.

The law reform report

The Victorian Law Reform Commission tabled its Neighbourhood Tree Disputes report in Parliament on November 27, 2019, with 63 recommendations. The Commission recommended a new Neighbourhood Tree Disputes Act to help neighbours resolve disputes quickly, affordably and effectively, and its report considers hearing such disputes at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The vic.gov.au page, read on October 8, 2026, describes the position as common law and general property law.

For protected trees, see the guide on council tree rules in Australia and New Zealand. The other places are on the neighbour tree law overview, including Queensland, which has an Act.

Sources