Preview build People, jobs, listings and posts are samples. Guides, events and the directory are real.
ArboNation Join free

White rot, brown rot and soft rot compared: what the sources say

How a California pest note, a Washington State extension sheet, a botanical garden and Forest Research define white, brown and soft rot in trees, and what each source says about strength loss.

Checked against the sources at the bottom of this page on October 8, 2026. Rules, fees and pay change: the source has the last word.

This page compares how published sources define the three main types of wood decay. It does not identify a decay type in any single tree. The sources are from the United States and the United Kingdom.

The three types side by side

TypeWhat the sources sayExamples with pages here
White rotThe Washington State University sheet says the majority of decay fungi on deciduous trees cause it and that wood strength declines gradually; UC IPM says white rots usually form in flowering trees and less often in conifersFull pages on Ganoderma, weeping conk
Brown rotThe Washington sheet says under 10 per cent of wood decay fungi cause it, mostly on conifers, and that large amounts of strength are lost early in the decayFull pages on Chicken of the woods
Soft rotThe Missouri Botanical Garden says the fungus mostly breaks down cellulose, leaving wood brittle; Forest Research uses it for MassariaFull pages on Brittle cinder fungus, Massaria

Strength loss, as the sources describe it

The Washington State University sheet says that in white rot wood strength declines gradually over time, while in brown rot large amounts of strength are lost early in the decay process. UC IPM says a 10 per cent loss of wood weight can result in a 70 to 90 per cent loss in wood strength, and that decay can be hidden, affecting strength without any outward sign. The Missouri Botanical Garden describes the soft rot of brittle cinder fungus as making wood brittle. The sources do not measure any particular tree.

How the sources use the terms

The Missouri Botanical Garden and the TCI Magazine article name the rot type next to each fungus, so a reader can see the same labels used across species: soft rot for brittle cinder fungus, white rot for Ganoderma and weeping conk, brown rot for chicken of the woods. Forest Research applies the label soft rot to the branch decay in Massaria disease of plane. Where a source gives a different label for the same fungus, the fungus page notes it.

The UC IPM pest note and the Washington sheet also describe where in the tree each rot is found, for example heartwood, sapwood, or butt and roots, and note that a conk is usually a late sign. That point is why they separate the type of rot from the visible fruiting body.

Where the sources stop

The sources agree that a type of rot is identified by sampling and expert examination, not by one sign alone. For the methods used to judge decay, see tree risk assessment methods. The way trees wall off decay is covered in tree biology. Each fungus has its own page, listed on wood decay fungi on trees.

Sources